They added: 'Mr Dylan will vigorously defend himself against these lawyer-driven lies and seek redress against all those responsible, including by seeking monetary sanctions against persons responsible for manufacturing and bringing this abusive lawsuit. 'The allegation is false, malicious, reckless and defamatory. 'It was filed in bad faith for the improper purpose of extracting a huge payout on the threat of negative publicity. The accuser claims she can also converse with living and dead animals and can read tea lives, coffee grinds and lipstick smudges, the filing reads.ĭylan's lawyers said: 'This case – based on plaintiff’s alleged interactions with Bob Dylan more than 56 years ago - is a brazen shakedown masquerading as a lawsuit. The accuser initially said the abuse took place over a six-week period between April and May in 1965 (pictured: Dylan in 1965)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |